Ethics and different Culture- Right or Wrong?

For the comparable reason that I wait on volume in the eye while conversing, a apparent movement of assertion and sincerity, is the similar reason that the people of Japan consider designate and regular eye contact a rude gesture that direction defiance or challenge, and they shift their eyes or look down to show respect to a nonher. Our culture ameliorate us to act in certain ways and punishing habits concur to what is considered normal. I argue that honorable and respectable set be determined by iodines culture. Culture dictates what a individual learns, how one behaves, and their habitual modes of thought and reason. Individuals are subject to forbiddenside influences and each(prenominal) soulfulness is responsible for making decisions in an ethical-as seen by culture- manner. An rating of what is full(a) and bad is related to the ethnical background out of which they arise. The execute a person partakes in is dependant on the nine which one belongs . For example: human alienate and cannibalism in the 1500 hundreds was a common practice of the American Indians when Cortez landed in south-east America. It was considered ethically repulsive and unacceptable to the Spanish. At the same time, the Spanish also had their forms of punishment, burning at the sake, which was equally horrible to the Indians and was considered a great evil. This display of differences is a labeled cultural relativism; the Spanish considered burning at the stake an ethical form of carrying into action as did the rest of Western Europe. But when presented in southeasterly America to the Indians, it was rejected as evil. Who is to say that human free is any worst or better than burning at the stake?

The Indians have as practically right to ten-strike the Spanish as the Spanish do to criticize the Indians. Interestingly, good and immoral... The argument is a good one, and has been excellently illustrated and supported by specific examples. A good paper always presents a point that is arguable. The point of this paper is arguable, but the author does not address the argument. What is the alternative way, or what are the alternative ways, of regarding ethical motive and culture? What are the weaknesses of those other methods? This essay could be much strengthened by addressing, for example, religious absolutism. If you want to redeem a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay